Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus nomius in a patient with disseminated phaeohyphomycosis resistant to antifungal drugs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v41i4.21713Keywords:
Aspergillus nomius, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, phaeohyphomycosis, Exophiala spinifera, posaconazole, caspofungin.Abstract
The aim of this presentation is to present the clinical, mycological and histopathological findings of a case of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus nomius, in a 52 year old woman, who suffers from disseminated phaeohyphomycosis with cutaneous, ganglionary and bone lesions due to Exophiala spinifera with 22 years of evolution. This pulmonary aspergillosis presented clinically
as a chronic pneumonia of the middle lobe of the right lung, which evolved toward excavation and the production of a chronic lung abscess. This mycosis appeared during posaconazole treatment, at a daily dose of 800 mg, and the infection presented a good clinical response to intravenous caspofungin. The patient was submitted to surgical remotion of middle and lower lobes of the right lung. Histopathological study of the surgical sample showed Aspergillus nomius invasion of blood vessels and the production of an epithelioid granuloma with giant cells around the endovascular hyphae. The etiologic agent of this aspergillosis was also isolated from several sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage samples and its identification as Aspergillus nomius was done by molecular biology studies. We were not able to establish a clear cause of immunodeficiency.
Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.