MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF Cysticercus bovis AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF THE HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v40i4.16764Keywords:
Cysticercosis, Cysticercus bovis, Taenia saginata, Taeniasis, PCR.Abstract
Bovine cysticercosis is considered the main epidemic link of human taeniasis caused by Taenia saginata and responsible for great damage in the whole productive chain of meat. The aim of this study was to verify the species-specific molecular identity of bovine cysticerci classified into four stages of the process of host-parasite interaction. The cysticerci were collected during the bovine’s post mortem examination by the service of federal inspection in a slaughterhouse in the State of Goiás. Initially, the cysticerci were classified according to anatomopathological criteria. Subsequently, the PCR technique was applied using specific primers for the amplification of fragments of the Cysticercus bovis gene LSU RNAr. The results showed that PCR may be appliedin the species-specific identification of bovine cysticerci. The assertiveness in its results was larger in DNA samples from cysticerci classified in VS (Vesicular Stage) and CVS (Colloidal Vesicular Stage) in relation to the assertiveness in the results of PCR from DNA samples from cysticerci classified in GNS (Granular Nodular Stage) and CNS (Calcified Nodular Stage). The negativity in the PCR results was larger in DNA samples from cysticerci located in the heart and classified in GNS than the negativity from samples of the same cysticerci stage located in the mastication muscles.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.