IN VITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY OF CtyptOcdccus neoformans OF CLINICAL ISOLATES FROM AIDS PATIENTS: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ETEST AND BROTH MACRODILUTION METHODS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v32i2.14376Abstract
A comparative study of Etest and broth macrodilution methods for susceptibility testing to fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole and amphotericin B was conducted for sixty strains of
C. neoformans isolated from Aids patients. The MICs obtained by these two methods were read after 72 hours of incubation for broth macrodilution and 48 hours for Etest. The rate agreement was obtained between the broth macrodilution and Etest methods using differences with 2 doubling dilutions. Our data showed that there was a good correlation between the MICs obtained by both methods. The correlation between these two methods tested was 96.6% (58/60), 90.0% (54/60), 93.3% (56/60) and 100% (60/60) for fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B, respectively. These results indicate that Etest could be considered useful for antifungal sensitivity evaluation of yeasts in clinical laboratories.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.