Strongyloides stercoralis AND OTHER ENTEROPARASITES IN INDIVIDUALS OF RURAL AREA OF UBERLÂNDIA, MINAS GERAIS STATE , BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5216/rpt.v39i2.10728Keywords:
Strongyloides stercoralis, Enteroparasites, Children/Adults, Rural area, Brazil.Abstract
The aim of this study was to verify the occurrence of Strongyloides stercoralis and other enteroparasites in the rural area of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, between September 1996 and May 1997, using the Baermann - Moraes and Lutz methods. Out of 180 individuals studied, 92 (51.1%) were infected. Twelve people (6.7%) were infected by S. stercoralis, being five in children with ages between zero and 12 years old and 7 cases older than 12 years old. Other enteroparasites diagnosed were Entamoeba coli (27.2%), Giardia lamblia (10.6%), Hookworm (7.2%), Endolimaxnana (3.9%), Ascaris lumbricoides (3.3%), Entamoeba hartmanni (3.3%), Enterobius vermicularis (2.2%), Hymenolepis nana (1.1%), Iodamoeba butschlii (1.1%), Entamoeba histolytica/dispar (0.6%), and Schistosoma mansoni (0.6%). Of the 92 positive cases there were 71% with mono-parasitism, 25% with bi-parasitism, and 4% with poly-parasitism. It was concluded that strongyloidiasis is hyperendemic in the rural area of Uberlândia. We highlighted the importance of the multiple parasitological methods performed in three different occasions with fecal samples
of each individual, which enhanced the possibilities for detection of an elevated enteroparasite rate (51.1%). We also point out to a serious public health problem in this rural area.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The manuscript submission must be accompanied by a letter signed by all authors stating the full name and email address, confirming that the material has not been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, and agreeing to transfer copyright in all media and formats for Journal of Tropical Pathology. The authors will not be paid for published articles. They are solely responsible for the content of those articles, even if the Editor holds the right to adjust them to the norms of the journal.
The reviewers will not be paid for the peer review process.