Tension in Brazilian Political Science: the production of doctors and the perception of editors

Authors

  • Nelson Rosário de Souza Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Fabiane Helene Valmore Universidade Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v22i2.54454

Abstract

Political Science in Brazil experiences tensions between institutionalist and societal approaches.
For some the predominant role of institutionalism is positive. Others believe that this hegemony
creates inequality in the area and undermines the reflection on democracy. Our objective is
to describe the recent production (2005-2014) in important journals in the field of Political
Science comparing institutionalism and societalism and giving special attention to the articles
on democracy and inequality. We observe, quantitatively and qualitatively, the production of
doctors in political science in seven major scientific journals. The perception of the journal
editors about this process completes the corpus. We conclude that the institutionalist hegemony
is confirmed in the production of doctors, but not without generating dissatisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nelson Rosário de Souza, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Realizou estágio pós-doutoral com bolsa Capes na Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris III. Doutor em sociologia pela Universidade de São Paulo, tendo cumprido estágio de pesquisa na École Des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (Paris) com bolsa do CNPq. Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade Federal do Paraná. Atua nas áreas de sociologia e ciência politica, com ênfase em sociologia da comunicação, comunicação política e cultura e comunicação. 

Fabiane Helene Valmore, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Mestre em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Paraná e bacharel em Ciências Sociais - Linha de Formação: Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. 

Downloads

Published

2019-10-06

How to Cite

SOUZA, N. R. de; VALMORE, F. H. Tension in Brazilian Political Science: the production of doctors and the perception of editors. Sociedade e Cultura, Goiânia, v. 22, n. 2, 2019. DOI: 10.5216/sec.v22i2.54454. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufg.br/fcs/article/view/54454. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Free Articles

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and of the initial publication in this journal;
    2. Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and of the initial publication in this journal;
    3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can bring productive change as well as increases the impact and the citation of the published work (see O Efeito do Acesso Livre).