DOI: 10.5216/cab.v12i4.5234
EFFECT OF IN OVO
VACCINATION PROCEDURES ON JAPANESE QUAIL EMBRYOS (Coturnix japonica) AND INCUBATION PERFORMANCE
Josue Moura
Romao1, Thania Gislaine Vasconcelos de Moraes2, Rosa
Patrícia Ramos Salles3, William Maciel Cardoso3, Carlos
Carbo Buxade4
This work aimed to evaluate the
effects of in ovo vaccination
procedures on incubation of Japanese quail eggs. The experiment was carried out
in a (4 x 3) factorial design with 12 experimental treatments (4 injection days
x 3 injection protocols). The injections were tested on four incubation days:
at 0, 5, 10 or 15. On each injection day, the eggs were submitted to one out of
three distinct injection procedures: saline injection and Newcastle disease
(ND) vaccine plus saline or industrial diluent. The eggs were incubated at
37.5º C and 60% RH. All eggs and hatched quails were weighed. Unhatched eggs
were opened to classify embryo mortality. Hatched quails were raised to obtain
blood to evaluate antibody response against Newcastle disease virus (NDV). The
injection process itself (saline) was not harmful at 10 and 15 days of
incubation for Japanese quail eggs; however, in ovo vaccination with live ND
vaccine (HB1 strain) is not recommended to fertile quail eggs at any incubation
periods due to high levels of embryo mortality and poor post-hatch antibody titers.
EFEITO DOS PROCEDIMENTOS DE VACINAÇÃO IN OVO SOBRE EMBRIÕES DE CODORNA
JAPONESA (Coturnix japonica) E
DESEMPENHO DA INCUBAÇÃO
Esta pesquisa avaliou os efeitos dos procedimentos de vacinação in ovo na incubação artificial de
codornas japonesas. Foi realizado um delineamento fatorial 4 x 3 com 12
tratamentos (4 dias de injeção x 3 protocolos de injeção). As injeções foram
realizadas nos dias 0, 5, 10 ou 15 de incubação. Em cada um desses dias, os
ovos foram injetados com 3 protocolos diferentes: injeção de soro fisiológico e
injeção da vacina vírus vivo da doença de Newcastle (DN) com soro fisiológico
ou diluente industrial. Os ovos foram incubados a 37,5°C e 60% UR. Todos os
ovos e codornas nascidas foram pesados. Os ovos não eclodidos foram submetidos
ao embriodiagnóstico. As codornas nascidas foram criadas para coleta de sangue
e avaliação de títulos de anticorpos contra o vírus da DN. Os resultados
demonstraram que a inoculação em si (soro) não foi prejudicial para os ovos com
10 e 15 dias de incubação. Verificou-se que a vacinação in ovo com o vírus vivo
da DN (cepa HB1) não é recomendada para ovos férteis de codorna em nenhuma
idade do embrião, devido aos elevados índices de mortalidade embrionária e
pouca resposta de anticorpos após o nascimento.
In
ovo technology has been studied in the last few years for administration of
hormones, nutrients and vaccines. It has been widely applied for vaccination
purposes. This technology is already present in 30 countries and accounts for
more than 85% of broilers and 60% breeders vaccinated in United States and
Canada (BERCHIERI & BOLIS, 2003).
In chicken, in ovo vaccines are administered to
embryos on day 18 of incubation, which is normally when incubating eggs are
transferred to the hatcher (LI et al., 2005). This method offers the advantages
of reducing chick handling, improving hatchery manageability through
automation, reducing the costs of live production and stimulating an early
immune response (JOHNSTON et al., 1997). Many studies have proceeded to
investigate the efficacy and safety of in
ovo vaccination against Marek’s disease (SHARMA & BURMESTER, 1982),
infectious bronchitis (WAKENELL & SHARMA, 1986), infectious bursal disease
(IBD) (GIAMBRONE et al., 2001), and Newcastle disease (AHMAD & SHARMA,
1992).
Newcastle disease (ND) is a
highly contagious viral disease of poultry and other bird species caused by
specified viruses of the avian paramyxovirus type I (APMV-I) belonging to the
family Paramyxoviridae (MAYO, 2002).
Studies within the last few
years have shown, however, that only few live vaccines that are routinely
administered to hatched chicks may also be injected into embryonated eggs
during the late stages of embryonic development without a lethal effect (MAST
& MEULEMANS, 2003). NDV strains of low virulence such as the Bl strain
(AHMAD & SHARMA, 1992) and NDV clone-30 (MEBATSION et al., 2001), which are
routinely administered to hatched chicks, cannot be employed for in
ovo vaccination in their current form due to their embryonic lethality. In
order to attenuate NDV strains, different approaches have been applied.
Hitchner Bl derived NDV strain is recommended for in ovo vaccination, mutated
by the chemical agent ethyl methanesulfonate (AHMAD & SHARMA, 1992).
According to LIMA et al. (2004), vaccination programs can efficiently eradicate
this NDV in quails.
However, the in
ovo vaccination procedures against ND for Japanese quail eggs have not been
studied. Thus, the objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of in
ovo vaccination procedures on incubation performance in Japanese quail
embryos (Coturnix japonica),
analyzing the effect of the inoculation itself as well as the vaccinal virus on
the embryos.
Eighty Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) were used for egg
collections. They were housed in experimental battery cages in the Laboratório
de Estudos Ornitológicos da Universidade Estadual do Ceará. Three females and
one male were lodged in each cage (25 x 25 x 20cm). The birds were 12 weeks old
and averaged 90% egg production. Water and balanced feed were supplied ad libitum according to NATIONAL
RESEARCH COUNCIL (1994). They were also submitted to 17 hours/day of light. All
the collected eggs were selected verifying egg shape, extreme sizes and
eggshell integrity by candling.
A total of 600 quail eggs
was divided into a (4 x 3) factorial design with 12 experimental treatments (4
injection days x 3 injection types), each group had 50 eggs. Other 150 eggs
were also incubated without any injection (Control group).
The in ovo injections were
tested at four incubation days: at 0 day (prior to incubation), 5 days, 10 days
or 15 days of incubation (transference day).
On each injection day, the
experimental eggs were submitted to three distinct injection procedures: saline
injection, Newcastle vaccine plus saline injection or Newcastle vaccine plus
industrial diluent injection.
The eggs were removed from
incubators and the in ovo injection was performed at room
temperature in a clean lab. First the eggs were disinfected with ethyl alcohol
(70%) and then they were placed with their large end up. This part of eggshell
was holed with a sterile hollow neddle (0.8mm diameter) to allow the injection
of 0.025mL of inoculum. The eggs were injected by an adjustable micropipette
with plastic tips adapted with hollow neddles (0.7mm diameter). The inoculum
was delivered at 4-5mm deepth from eggshell surface. The injection procedure
made a hole in the eggshell with an area of approximately 0.5mm² and then the
eggs were placed again in the incubator machines.
All treatments consisted of
injection of 0.025mL of a solution as follows: saline, vaccine plus saline or
vaccine plus industrial diluent.
Saline: Physiological
saline solution 0.9% Sodium Chloride. Na+ 154 mEq/L, Cl- 154 mEq/L. Total
osmolarity of 308 milliosmoles per liter and 6.0 pH.
Vaccine: live freeze-dried
vaccine of Newcastle disease, Hitcher B1 strain (HB1).
Industrial diluent: Sterile
diluent for vaccination by eye drop route consisting of water treated by
reverse osmosis and inert dye. Both vaccine and diluent were made by the same
manufacturer.
Live freeze-dried vaccines
were rehydrated just before the use for injection into quail eggs with industrial
diluent or saline according to each experimental treatment. The vaccine
dilution was prepared by mixing 1000 doses of vaccine with 30 mL of diluent.
All procedures from storage to manipulation of injected substances were carried
out according to manufacturers’ recommendations.
All eggs were identified
individually and weighed on their collection day and on the 15th day of
incubation to verify egg weight loss. All hatched quails were weighed
individually after hatching. Weight measurements were obtained with a precision
balance (0.001g).
Eggs were incubated in
horizontal position by automatic hatcheries with temperature of 37.5°C,
relative humidity of 60% and egg turning every 2 hours. On the 15th day of
incubation (360h) the eggs were transferred to the hatcher, which maintained
the same conditions of humidity and temperature, but without turning. After
hatch the quails were housed in an experimental poultry facility. They were
reared up to 15 days, in experimental cages according to each treatment. Each
cage was supplied with water and balanced feed ad libitum according to NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1994), 24 hours
of light and heat. After 15 days, all quail chicks were euthanized to perform
the blood collections.
Eggs that failed to hatch
were opened for macroscopic observation, thus they were classified according to
time of embryonic mortality. They were staged as infertile-early death embryo,
which were the eggs with true infertility, pre-incubation mortality or initial
stage mortality. The embryos that presented mortality in the intermediate
development stage were classified as intermediate embryo death. Unhatched eggs
classified as final embryo death were the ones with late stage mortality or
pipped eggs with dead embryos. This classification was according to PEDROSO et
al. (2006), who classified the embryo mortality in quail chicks as early death
embryos (1 up to 4 days), intermediate (5 up to 15) and late death embryo (16
up to 18 days).
Hatched quails were reared
separately according to each experimental group up to 15 days, when blood
collections were made in order to assess the antibody response against
Newcastle disease vaccination.
The birds were euthanized
by decapitation and blood samples were collected from jugular vein. Sera were
separated, identified and frozen at -20ºC until the serological tests were
performed.
Serological analysis was
performed by haemagglutination inhibition test (HI) according to ALLAN &
GOUGH´s (1974) methodology. The test was done in V-bottomed microtitre plates
with 96 wells. It started with the addition of 25 μL of phosphate buffered saline-PBS (pH 7.2) in
each well of the microtitre plates. A multichannel pipette was used to perform
serial twofold dilutions of each serum sample along the row by transferring 25 μL of fluid from one well to the next. 25 μL of ND virus antigen at a concentration of 4
haemagglutination units was added to each well. The side of plates was tapped
gently to mix, and then they were covered and allowed to stand at room
temperature (26ºC) for 30 minutes. Afterwards, 25 μL of a 1% suspension of red blood cells was added
to each well. The side of plates was tapped gently to mix again, and then they
were covered and allowed to stand at room temperature for 45 minutes for the
appearance of a pattern of haemagglutination. The agglutination pattern was
read and the titers were recorded as the highest dilution of serum that caused
complete inhibition of haemagglutination.
HI results from individual
birds were expressed as the reciprocal of the end point serum dilution. Three
rows of wells were left as controls: the first row contained a known NDV
antiserum (positive control), the second row contained NDV antigen alone
(negative control) and the third row contained normal saline with chicken red
blood cells (reagent control).
A total of 600 quail eggs
was divided into a (4 x 3) factorial design with 12 experimental treatments (4
injection days x 3 injection types). Each experimental group (n=50) consisted
of five replicates of 10 eggs. Additional 150 eggs were not part of the
factorial design but were used as control. Data from factorial design for the
different analyzed variables (hatchability, egg weight loss, hatch weight and
embryo mortality) was analyzed by the PROC MIXED from SAS v.9.0 (2002) and the
means were compared by PDIFF statment adjusted by Tukey allowing all pairwise
comparisons. Letters for statistical differences were obtained by the Macro
PDMIX.800. A second statistical approach was applied to compare the control
group results with each of the other 12 experimental treatments. This analysis
was carried out using PROC GLM and the means were compared with Dunnett’s test.
Statements of significance
were based on P<0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results showed
that eggs that received in ovo
injection before the incubation (0 day) presented similar hatch rates. This
shows that at this period the injection of live vaccine of ND is not
detrimental to hatchability when compared to the group that received only
saline. At this period the embryo is still in its early stages of development and
almost all egg’s volume is filled by albumen and yolk. According to BURLEY
& VADEHRA (1989) the albumen proteins present non-specific defenses against
microorganisms and probably against virus. This could be the reason why the
live virus was not able to affect the egg hatchability compared to the eggs
that received saline. The process of in
ovo injection before incubation even with saline solution was harmful to
embryo survival, since the hatch rates of injected eggs were lower than the
control group (p<0.05).
The hatchability of
eggs injected with saline at 5 days was similar to the ones injected before the
incubation. However, this hatch rate was completely different to the eggs
injected at 5 days with vaccine which had 0% hatchability. This result shows
that the in ovo injection with live
vaccine of ND (B1) was lethal to quail embryos at 5 days of development. This
finding is in accordance with some studies that have
shown that only few live vaccines that are routinely administered to hatched chicks
may also be injected into embryonated eggs during the late stages of
embryonation without a lethal effect (MAST
& MEULEMANS, 2003). NDV strains of low virulence,
such as the Bl strain (AHMAD &
SHARMA, 1992) and
NDV clone-30 (MEBATSION et al., 2001), which are routinely administered to hatched chicks,
cannot be employed for in ovo
vaccination in their current form due to their embryonic lethality.
The eggs injected at 10 and 15 days with saline
presented hatch rates similar to control, showing that the injection procedure
was not detrimental to quail embryos at 10 and 15 days of development. However,
eggs injected with live vaccine at 10 and 15 days had lower hatchability than
the control group. Interestingly, the embryos at 15 days of development seemed
to be more resistant to live vaccination compared to embryonated eggs
vaccinated at 10 days, since those showed lower hatch rates compared to the
older ones. The results indicate that the HB1 strain cannot be applied to in ovo vaccination to quail eggs due to
its high impact on hatchability. It is relevant to mention that on the transference
day (15 days for quails and 18 days for chickens), Japanese quail embryos seemed
to be more resistant than chicken embryos regarding the in ovo vaccination with a lentogenic NDV strain since chicks were
shown to present up to 100% mortality (SARAVANABAVA et al., 2005). Maybe a
process of attenuation of this strain could produce a better hatchability for
quail eggs. Different approaches have been applied in
order to attenuate NDV strains. AHMAD & SHARMA (1992) described a Hitchner
Bl derived NDV strain for in ovo
vaccination, mutated by the chemical agent ethyl methanesulfonate. La sota
strain has also been attenuated to in ovo
vaccination by selection of scape mutants with monoclonal antibodies (MAST et
al., 2006).
The use of saline solution or industrial
diluent to rehydrate the freeze-dried vaccine did not promote differences among
the groups of eggs vaccinated at the same period. Thus, it was verified that
both saline solution and industrial diluent have similar effects on hatch rate
concerning their use to in ovo
vaccination against ND.
Figure 2 shows the percentile of weight loss of Japanese quail eggs that
were in ovo injected at four different periods of incubation with three
different solutions.
The egg weight loss is an important parameter
for incubation. It has been used to estimate vital gas exchange (PAGANELLI et
al., 1978; RAHN et al., 1979) and has been correlated with the rate of
embryonic metabolism and development (RAHN & AR, 1980; BURTON & TULLET,
1983). AR & RAHN (1980) examined the loss of mass in eggs during incubation
and evidences showed that this was essentially due to loss
of water. The water vapor conductance is related to the pore area and thickness
of eggshell (RAHN & AR, 1974).
Some of the treatments had an egg weight loss
similar to eggs in control group, while others had a higher egg weight loss.
That can be partially explained by the hole that was made to perform the
injection of solutions. The process of in
ovo injection into the egg creates a hole with approximately 0.5mm² that
increases the conductance area of eggshell. Without artificial holes, the gas
exchange is made only by the pores that are naturally distributed on eggshell.
It was not found any statistical difference for
eggs injected at 15 days, thus, this process does not interfere when in ovo injection is performed at the
later stages of embryo development.
In general, the eggs injected at 10 days of
incubation presented higher levels of weight loss compared to eggs that were
injected earlier (0 and 5 days) and later (15 days). The increase of weight
loss and therefore the conductance between the egg and the environment can be
particularly interesting for poultry embryos at the later stages of incubation
for a better performance of gas exchange and respiration. In chicken eggs, the in ovo injection performed by 16 gauge
(1.6mm diameter) needles provide an addition of 25 to 30% of relative pore
volume, which can be considered as a physiological advantage (BERCHIERI &
BOLIS, 2003).
Figure 3 shows the chick/egg weight ratio (%) of Japanese quail eggs
that were in ovo injected at four
different periods of incubation with three different solutions.
The weight of chicks at hatch can be affected
by several factors, including species, breed, egg nutrient levels, egg
environment, egg size (WILSON, 1991), weight loss during incubation period,
weight of shell and other residues at hatch (TULLET & BURTON, 1982), shell
quality and incubator conditions (PEEBLES et al., 1987). In this experiment,
the hatch weight was affected by different factors, such as the procedures of in ovo injection. Most in ovo injection treatments promoted a
reduction in hatch weight compared to the eggs that were not injected (control
group). The eggs injected at 10 days of incubation were the ones that presented
the lower chick/egg weight ratio. We believe that this lower hatch weight for
eggs injected at 10 days can be related to their weight loss during incubation.
Increased weight loss and reduced hatch weight may promote detrimental effects
on survival of newly hatched quails, since these parameters may lead to
dehydration. Small chicks have higher surface area to weight ratios and are
therefore more easily dehydrated than larger chicks. Dehydration has been
reported to be associated with higher mortality of chicks from young breeders (WYATT
et al., 1985).
The eggs inject at 15 days of incubation were
among the ones that seemed to be the least affected by in ovo injection, concerning hatch weight, which might indicate
that the older the embryo (past 10 days of development) at the time of in ovo injection the higher will be the
hatch weight, probably due to a lower egg weight loss.
Eggs injected with ND live vaccine or saline
solution were not statistically different when compared in the same injection
day, showing that the in ovo
vaccination with Newcastle disease virus did not alter initial weight of
hatched Japanese quails. The exception were the eggs vaccinated with live ND
virus at 5 days, which did not survive; therefore, they were not measured for
hatch weight.
Figure 4 shows the frequency of embryo mortality of Japanese quail eggs
that were in ovo injected at four
different periods of incubation with three different solutions.
Differences on embryonic mortality were not
found between eggs injected on the same day with vaccine plus saline or
diluent. Most injection treatments results differed from the control group (not
submitted to any injection procedure). The only groups that did not differ
significantly were the ones injected at 10 or 15 days with saline. Most
injected groups seemed to have higher levels of final death than
infertile/early death. On the other hand, the eggs injected with saline at 15
days and the ones injected with vaccine at 0 and 5 days showed infertile/early
death as the main reason for failure to hatch. The intermediate embryo death
was the least relevant classification of unhatched eggs and did not appear in
all groups. These observations are similar with those from chicken eggs that do
not present relevant intermediate mortality, since there are two phases of
increased embryonic mortality during incubation: the first phase occurs during
the first week of incubation and the second phase during the last week (JASSIM
et al., 1996). The process of in ovo
injection can increase embryo mortality since the hole made in the eggshell
provides the opportunity to microbial infection. When the hole is made at the
later stages of embryo development the time of exposure to a microbial
challenge is decreased and the embryo is more prepared to face a microbial
challenge, but when the process is done in the earlier stages of incubation,
the exposure time is longer and the embryo has not a well developed immune
system (BERCHIERI & BOLIS, 2003), thus, the process can be detrimental to
quail embryo survival.
The hatched quails from all treatments were
bled at 15 days of age to evaluate antibody titers against Newcastle disease
virus. In general, the birds did not respond well. Eggs injected at 0 day did
not have quails with antibody against NDV. The eggs injected at 5 days of
incubation with vaccine had 0% of hatchability. The eggs injected with ND
vaccine at 10 and 15 days presented 8.7% and 6.9% of hatched quails with
antibodies against Newcastle disease. These poor levels of response to in ovo vaccination can be explained by
the use of an aggressive and inadequate NDV strain for in ovo vaccination purpose. Furthermore, it is necessary to study
more the injection site in quail eggs since different locations can promote
varied in ovo vaccination responses.
For example, it was verified that the injection of Marek’s vaccine in air cell
provided no protection for chicks, when it was applied in allantoic fluid the
protection ranged from 25 to 50%, and when it was applied in amniotic fluid the
protection was 90% (BERCHIERI & BOLIS, 2003).
CONCLUSION
The injection process itself (saline) is not
harmful at 10 and 15 days of incubation for Japanese quail eggs; however, in ovo vaccination with live Newcastle
vaccine (HB1 strain) is not recommended to fertile quail eggs at any incubation
period due to high levels of embryo mortality and poor post-hatch antibody
titers.
REFERENCES
AHMAD, J.; SHARMA,
J.M. Evaluation of a modified-live virus vaccine administered in ovo to protect chickens against
Newcastle disease. American Journal of Veterinary
Research, v.53, p.1999–2004, 1992.
ALLAN, W.H.; GOUGH,
R.E. A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease.1.A
comparison of macro and micro methods. The
Veterinary Record, v.95, p.120-123, 1974.
AR, A.; RAHN, H. Water in the avian egg: overall budget of incubation. American
Zoologist, v.20, p.373- 384, 1980.
BERCHIERI, JR. A.; BOLIS, D.A. Vacinações e aplicações
de produtos intra-ovo. In: MACARI, M.; GONZALES, E. (ed). Manejo da Incubação: FACTA, Campinas-Brasil, 2003, p.267-283.
BURLEY, R.W.;
VADEHRA, D.V. The Avian Egg:
Chemistry and Biology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 372p, 1989. p 68–71.
BURTON, F.G.; TULLET, S.G. A comparison of the
effect of eggshell porosity on the respiration and growth of domestic fowl,
duck and turkey embryos. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part A,
v.75, p.167-174, 1983.
GIAMBRONE, J. J.;
DORMITORIO, T.; BROWN, T. Safety and efficacy of in ovo administration of infectious bursal disease viral vaccines. Avian Diseases, v.45, p.44–148, 2001.
JASSIM, E.W.; GROSSMAN, M.; KOPS, W.J.; LUYKX, R.A.J. Multiphasic
analysis of embryonic mortality in chickens.
Poultry Science, v.75, p.464-471, 1996.
JOHNSTON, P.A.;
LIU, H.; O’CONNELL, T.; PHELPS, P.; BLAND, M.; TYCZKOWSKI, J.; KEMPER, A.;
HARDING, T.; AVAKIAN, A.; HADDAD, E.; WHITFILL, C.; GILDERSLEEVE, R.; RICKS, C.
A. Applications in in ovo technology.
Poultry Science, v.76, p.165–178,
1997.
LI C.S.; WANG, L.Y.; CHOU, C.C. Field evaluation of flock production performance
of in ovo injection of infectious
bursal disease virus immune complex vaccine in commercial broiler farms. Journal
of Applied Poultry Research, v.14, p.338–344, 2005.
LIMA, F.S.; SANTIN, E.; PAULILLO, A.C.; JUNIOR, L.D.; MORAES, V.M.B.;
GAMA, N.M.Q.; ITURRINO, R.P.S. Evaluation of different programs of Newcastle
disease vaccination in Japanese quail (Coturnix
coturnix japonica). International
Journal of Poultry Science, v.3, n.5,
p.354-356, 2004.
MAST, J.;
MEULEMANS, G. Attenuated mutant Newcastle disease virus strains for in ovo vaccination, method for preparing
and their use. European Patent WO 03/030932 Al, 2003.
MAST,
J.; NANBRU, C.; DECAESSTECKER, M.; LAMBRECHT, B.; COUVREUR, B.; MEULEMANS, G.;
BERG, T. Vaccination of chicken embryos with escape mutants of La Sota
Newcastle disease virus induces a protective immune response. Vaccine, v.24, p.1756–1765, 2006.
MAYO, M.A. A
summary of taxonomic changes recently approved by ICTV. Archives of Virology, v.147, p.1655–1656, 2002.
MEBATSION, T.; VERSTEGEN,
S.; DE VAAN, L.T.; ROMER-OBERDORFER, A.; SCHRIERR, C.C. A recombinant Newcastle
disease virus with low-level V protein expression is immunogenic and lacks
pathogenicity for chicken embryos. Journal
of Virology, v.75, p.420-428, 2001.
NATIONAL
RESEARCH COUNCIL – NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. Washington, D.C.: p.44-45, 1994.
PAGANELLI, C.V.; ACKERMAN, R.A.; RAHN, H. The avian egg: In vitro condutances to oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and water vapor in late development. In: PIIPER, J. (ed). Respiratory
function in birds, adult and embryonic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
Germany, 1978. p. 212-218.
PEDROSO, A.A.; CAFÉ, M.B.; LEANDRO,
N.S.M.; STRINGHINI, J.H.; CHAVES, L.S.
Desenvolvimento embrionário e eclodibilidade de ovos de codornas armazenados
por diferentes períodos e incubados em umidades e temperaturas distintas. Revista
Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.35, n.6,
p.2344-2349, 2006.
PEEBLES, E.D.;
BRAKE, J.; GILDERSLEEVE, R.P. Effects of eggshell cuticle removal and incubation
humidity on embryonic development and hatchability of broilers. Poultry Science, v.66, p.834–840, 1987.
RAHN, H.; AR, A.
Gas exchange of the avian egg: time, structure and function. American Zoologist, v.20, p.477-484,
1980.
RAHN, H.; AR, A. The avian egg: Incubation time and water loss. Condor, v.76, p.147-152, 1974.
RAHN, H.; AR, A.;
PAGANELLI, C.V. How bird eggs breathe. Scientific
American, v.240, p.46-55, 1979.
SARAVANABAVA, K.;
NACHIMUTHU, K.; PADMANABAN, V.D. Effect of tuftsin on embryo vaccination with
Newcastle disease virus vaccine. Comparative
Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, v.28, p.269–276, 2005.
SAS,. The
SAS system for Windows 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2002.
SHARMA, J.M.;
BURMESTER, B.R. Resistance to Marek’s Disease at hatching in chickens
vaccinated as embryos with the turkey herpesvirus. Avian Diseases, v.26, p.134-149, 1982.
TULLETT, S.C.; BURTON, F.G. Factors affecting the weight and water
status of the chick at hatch. British
Poultry Science, v. 23, p. 361-369, 1982.
WAKENELL, P.S.;
SHARMA, J.M. Chicken embryonal vaccination with avian infectious bronchitis
virus. American Journal of Veterinary
Research, v.47, p.933–938, 1986.
WILSON, H.R. Interrelationship of egg size, chick size, posthatching
growth, and hatchability. World’s
Poultry Science Journal, v.47, p. 5-20, 1991.
WYATT, C.L.; WEAVER, W.D.JR.; BEANE, W.L. Influence of egg size, eggshell quality and posthatch holding time on broiler performance. Poultry Science, v.64, p.2049–2055, 1985.